{"id":752,"date":"2024-11-18T14:02:29","date_gmt":"2024-11-18T19:02:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/?p=752"},"modified":"2024-11-18T14:03:04","modified_gmt":"2024-11-18T19:03:04","slug":"dynamic-piracy-shifting-ice-sheet-catchments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/?p=752","title":{"rendered":"Shifting Ice-Sheet Catchments"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Greenland&#8217;s Jakobshavn Glacier (locally known as Sermeq Kujalleq) is one of the fastest-moving glaciers in the world and a major contributor to sea-level rise. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/jog.2024.73\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/jog.2024.73\">We have a new study looking at the ice-sheet area, or catchment, that Jakobshavn drains.<\/a> One of the approaches for assessing the mass balance, or health, of Jakobshavn is the input-output method. This method differences iceberg discharge into the ocean across the grounding line from net snow accumulation within its upstream catchment. This means you need a pretty good idea of Jakobshavn\u2019s catchment area. But, today\u2019s currently available delineations of Jakobshavn\u2019s catchment area vary by \u00b112%. This uncertainty in catchment area translates into an uncertainty in area-integrated net snow accumulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja2.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"714\" src=\"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja2-1024x714.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-753\" srcset=\"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja2-1024x714.png 1024w, https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja2-300x209.png 300w, https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja2-768x535.png 768w, https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja2-1536x1071.png 1536w, https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja2-2048x1428.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 1 &#8211; Four widely used delineations of Jakobshavn Glacier&#8217;s ice-sheet catchment vary by \u00b112%, or approximately \u00b110,000 km<sup>2<\/sup>. Although we want to understand how Jakobshavn&#8217;s catchment will evolve over the coming century, it is challenging to simply agree on its delineation today.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Glacier catchments are not constant through time. For this study, we looked at how Jakobshavn\u2019s catchment area might evolve in the future. We used an ensemble of future ice flow simulations created for the Ice Sheet Model Inter-comparison Project (ISMIP6) to delineate Jakobshavn\u2019s catchment under different climate scenarios to the year 2100. The ensemble suggests that Jakobshavn\u2019s catchment could expand by 3\u20139%, depending on the intensity of ocean and atmospheric warming of a given climate scenario. These changes in Jakobshavn\u2019s catchment appear to trigger a phenomenon called \u201cdynamic piracy,\u201d whereby Jakobshavn is essentially stealing ice from its neighboring glaciers, redirecting it into its own flow toward the ocean.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja4.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"415\" src=\"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja4-1024x415.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-754\" srcset=\"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja4-1024x415.png 1024w, https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja4-300x122.png 300w, https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja4-768x311.png 768w, https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja4-1536x623.png 1536w, https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja4-2048x830.png 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 2 &#8211; The Jakobshavn Glacier catchment area delineated in 2015 and 2100 in thirteen ISMIP6 ensemble members. There is a diversity of model opinion on how Jakobshavn&#8217;s catchment looks, both today and tomorrow, but the ensemble generally agrees that catchment area will expand over the next century.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Generally, however, the ensemble of models has some challenges reproducing recently observed reorientations in inland ice flow. The models are generally less sensitive to climate change, producing less acceleration than actually observed. All but one of the ensemble members fail to reproduce recent accelerations in ice flow observed about 100 km inland from Jakobshavn\u2019s terminus. We interpret this as suggesting that the current ensemble of models likely underestimates future reorientations in deep inland ice flow. Simply put, they may not fully capture how rapidly the ice sheet\u2019s catchments are reorganizing themselves under future climate change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja3.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"730\" src=\"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja3-1024x730.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-755\" srcset=\"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja3-1024x730.png 1024w, https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja3-300x214.png 300w, https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja3-768x547.png 768w, https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Anja3.png 1500w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 3 &#8211; Comparison of modelled ice acceleration and rotation with the mean observed at ten GPS stations clustered at approximately 100 km inland from Jakobshavn&#8217;s terminus.<\/em> <em>The ensemble of models has difficulty reproducing this recently observed reorganization of inland ice flow.<\/em>  <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Our analysis of the ISMIP ensemble reminds us that big outlet glaciers are not just passive responders to climate change; they actively reshape their catchments in ways that ripple through the ice sheet. So, if we want accurate glacier-scale input-output assessments, then we need to have accurate glacier-scale catchments, both today and in the future. This highlights the importance of improving our delineation of ice-sheet catchments using both observational methods and ice flow models. This also means continually improving the ice flow models used to predict the future form and flow of Earth&#8217;s ice sheets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>L\u00f8kkegaard A., W. Colgan, A. Aschwanden and S.A. Khan. 2024. Recent and future variability of the ice-sheet catchment of Sermeq Kujalleq (Jakobshavn Isbr\u00e6), Greenland. <em>Journal of Glaciology<\/em>. 1-15. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/jog.2024.73\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/jog.2024.73<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Greenland&#8217;s Jakobshavn Glacier (locally known as Sermeq Kujalleq) is one of the fastest-moving glaciers in the world and a major contributor to sea-level rise. We have a new study looking at the ice-sheet area, or catchment, that Jakobshavn drains. One of the approaches for assessing the mass balance, or health, of Jakobshavn is the input-output [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25,32,12],"tags":[301,305,302,14,91,287,262,304,303],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/752"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=752"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/752\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":758,"href":"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/752\/revisions\/758"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=752"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=752"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/williamcolgan.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=752"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}